"'Who do you love?' 'I love Sheikh Osama Bin Laden,'...'who do you kill?' 'America'"
Brainwashing children toward terrorism is bad enough. It's even worse when its happening not in Palestine, but your own backyard. I wrote about Parviz Khan earlier, the Pakistani living in the UK who was just sentenced to life for plotting to kidnap and behead a British soldier ("life" in the UK could mean as little as 14 years, but that's another issue). If anyone had any doubts about his intentions, you can just look at transcripts of him speaking to his five year old son:
Khan ordered the boy to put down a toy he was playing with and said: "Stand up straight. Who do you love?".
Child: I love Sheikh Osama Bin Laden.
Khan: Allah, and...?
Child: Sheikh Abu Hamza [a convicted extremist cleric].
Khan: Who do you kill?
Child: America.
Khan: And who else do you kill?
Child: Bush I kill.
Khan: And who else?
Child: Blair - kill.
Khan: And?
Child: Both, I kill.
Khan: I speak, my son. Who else you kill? Kuffar? [a non-Muslim]
Child: Yeah, kuffar.
(Khan goes on to ask his son about black people, Indians, alcohol and Hindus. The boy replies "kill" to each one.)
How else did he treat his children?
He was so committed to waging war on Britain that he forced his four children to sleep on the floor without heating to toughen them up in case he ever took them to the Afghan mountains.
Khan's defense was rather pathetic. And for some reason, part of this quote was removed from the original article (although you see it referred to in the comments):
In mitigation, Michael Wolkind QC [Queens' Counsel], defending Khan, told the court that his client's plot had been a "mixture of fanaticism and fantasy".In other words, all you had to do was surrender to the terrorist's demands, and he wouldn't have plotted any terror. Totally logical, if complete surrender and capitulation don't bother you.
"His plan might have changed had British foreign policy changed," he said. "He might have withdrawn if the British troops were withdrawn."
Finally, people who support the UK's generous welfare state should take note:
Khan - who was paid £20,000 a year in benefits - also boasted of making non-Muslims "bleed financially" and said Muslims had a duty to "take from the Kuffar" (non-believers).£20,000 is $39,309 US dollars at the current rate. That's more money than a lot of hard-working people earn in full time jobs; certainly very generous of the British.
Original tip: jammiewearingfool.
Interested in reading more? Click on any label below to read related articles, bookmark this site, or subscribe to my RSS Feed


0 comments:
Post a Comment